Monthly Archives: June 2009

INITTOWINIT

When I worked at SRA International for the first nine months of my professional career, at what was once a small environmental consulting firm that had gotten swallowed up by a much bigger one which focused on defense but was looking to diversify their contract portfolio, the company had a competition whereby all the members of a team would wear pedometers (which measure steps taken) to get them to walk more and be more healthy. Teams were formed in different SRA offices, with a grand prize of two tickets per team member to some tropical destination, for the team with the greatest total number of steps taken. At the time I was struggling with being a recent graduate and feeling lost in the world, certain that SRA was not the right fit for someone with my interests, but not sure what was. SRA was located way the hell out in Virginia, from my very DC-centric vantage point, and on days in the summer after I hit the six month mark (afterwhich I’d decided I could begin looking for a new job), when I was more frustrated than I knew what to do with, I would walk all the way home, first from Clarendon and then after we’d moved offices, from Virginia Square, across Arlington and back up north through lower DC to Columbia Heights.

In hindsight, this was probably at least a six or seven mile walk, the way I went, and I was so frustrated in those days that I probably did it at least three times per week. I remember hearing about the SRA competition, meant to encourage physical activity on the part of their employees, and thinking that although I didn’t need to exercise more, I could probably win it if I was on a team with even remotely active people. One of the teams the year I was at SRA called themselves “INITTOWINIT”, which after five days I figured out was not some weird combination of vowels, but “in it to win it,” a catchphrase and approach I decided I liked a lot. Inittowinit did, in fact, win it, and was rewarded with the resultant trip to the tropics, while the phrase that was their namesake has remained stuck in my head, three years later.

When I get lazy, and frustrated, and kind of want to take a break, stare at the ceiling for awhile, and kick something, it occasionally pops back into my head, as a question. Are you inittowinit?

Today is such a day. Today, I am frustrated. Dherai, dherai frustrated, to borrow from the Nepali, but even as I am tempted to sit and mire in my frustration, or go off and hide somewhere with a pile of mangoes (mmm), I remind myself of the rules of this game, and that I am, in fact, in it to win it, as much as a field research project may be won.

I spent this morning at the District Forest Office here in Pokhara, where several very kind and very accommodating Forest Office staffers, akin to a blend of our National Park Rangers and our National Forest Service staff, talked through my project with me, and helped me see a long series of challenges which await my attention.

I had gone to the forest office in order to choose field sites, or so I euphemistically told myself (as if choosing field sites were as simple as picking the good fruit from among the bad and taking it home with you), and instead had a lengthy conversation with the DFO staff about the intrinsic problems in my sampling design.

Let me say here for the uninitiated – problems are okay. Problems are opportunities for learning, and for creative thinking, and brainstorming, and strategizing, and making one’s plans better. Identifying problems, especially before you get into the field, makes your research stronger, data easier to analyze, and saves you in some cases weeks of time. So this wasn’t totally a bad thing.

Except that I was hot, and overtired, and felt young-looking there in the DFO office, and understood too little of the conversation taking place around me, in Nepali. And this last was driving me crazy. Not because I wanted the DFO officers to speak in anything other than Nepali (it took me years of Spanish before I could have technical conversations about forest management or sustainable tourism with fluency), but because I myself have not come far enough fast enough to be able to competently understand what is being said. And so I need a translator, a role that one of the faculty was very kind to perform for me this morning, although he most certainly has better and more important things to do.

So I sat there and despite myself I mired in my failing, and in my lack of competence, even as I struggled to maintain my outwardly indomitable disposition, and to attend to every single Nepali word that issued forth, in case I might understand it. But because I could not speak adequate Nepali I could not myself explain my own research goals, and because I could not explain my research goals the DFO foresters and I spent an inordinate amount of time repeating one another and struggling to clarify our meaning. And I wished I could go back in time and work on my Nepali language abilities every.single.day of this past semester, except that I remember most of the days of the semester, and there wasn’t really an extra hour to be eeked out, anywhere.

As I sat somewhat disconsolately on the back of the professor’s motorcycle on the way back to campus, I thought a lot about what a sprint graduate school is, and how much faster the time passes than I would like. One of my friends from school likes to say that “fast and steady wins the race,” which I honestly thought was perhaps a little silly and obvious the first time he said it to me. As I sat on the back of the bike watching Pokhara fly by and enjoying the breeze the movement generated, however, it occurred to me that perhaps my friend’s saying is exactly right, at least for graduate school in the US. Fast and steady does win the race.

And by that I mean that you really can’t slow down, especially if you plan on doing field research, particularly if you plan on doing it abroad, and most definitely if you plan on doing it in a language you didn’t know at the time you began the program. We are all supposed to plow from school right into our summers, and it tires me to think of how quickly upon returning we will need to re-up for school, and dive right back in, to begin the charge through to the end. Whereas I in my few moments of self-pity thought about how good it would have been to take a break (and go the beach), I realized all at once that that’s just not how this game is played. In research, and in graduate school, we’re running a marathon at the pace of a sprint.

All this is to say, I will keep on keeping on. I took a short break upon returning to throw myself a pity party, eat some mangoes, and drink some water, and now I go back to it – I will figure out how to sample within a rotational cycle and find good field assistants by tomorrow, no matter what. Because I’m in it to win it. And because fast and steady wins the race.

-M-

It’s Gettin’ Hot in Here…

It is swelteringly hot in Nepal. Sticky, skin-clinging, little-bubbles-of-perspiration running along the concave slope of my upper lip kind of hot. The monsoon season may be coming, but it sure as hell ain’t in a hurry.

Yesterday I went with my new friend Deepak for a long walk to see the tremendous Setikhola gorge (khola is river in Nepali), a deep, beautiful, treacherous gorge which literally and innocuously drops out from amidst the foliage on the side of the road, and down several hundred feet to a chalky white river below, which boils with the outwash of the many miles it has traveled since leaving the Himalaya. It was just gorgeous, and completely breath-taking. Deepak told me stories of all the people who had died from walking too close to the edge of the rapidly eroding hillside, and as we walked around to the other end we watched three white women (who almost by definition are tourists) who had been wandering along where we had just stood, albeit much less cautiously, climb onto the edge of the gorge’s face without hesitation. From our vantage point we could see that in their focus on getting a good picture of the viewshed, however, they failed to realize that there was only a little over a foot of soil and plant matter below them before their little outcropping dropped off and away, possibly towards death. Too far to yell and tell them otherwise, and afraid to startle them from their tenuous perch, I turned my back, lest they actually fall, and we continued to walk.

We continued and passed along the back roads, through the villages that surround the true city part of Pokhara, and Deepak, who is both a 1st year Master of Science student at Ban Campus and a middle and high school science teacher at a local boarding school, enlightened me as to the trees and plants with which he was familiar. We saw what I have been told is the “early” (or pre-monsoonal) rice growing knee-high in the little angular plots fracturing the country into a patchwork of food and cultivation when seen from the sky, but now devoid of the water one imagines when one pictures rice paddies, because we haven’t had the rain. Yet.

As we walked we were passed by tiny old women hauling huge assemblages of grasses, fodder, and firewood on their heads, or hanging off their backs in long baskets designed for the carrying, which are sold by the side of the road in a myriad of sizes so that children and teenagers can haul materials as well. Small children played “football” on both sides with worn old soccer balls, so well kicked and treasured that there were no identifying brand markings left on them, and little air within. The children would occasionally pause their games to call out a sassy “HELLO!” to me, showing off their English and seeking acknowledgment of their very presence here. I almost always answer, sometimes amusing myself by answering the English-speaking children in Nepali, and the Nepali-speaking ones in English.

When I took a day off to relax a little last Saturday, I was very kindly invited along to a hotel pool with a group of women from the Christian mission down the road. We had exchanged numbers with the possibility of spending time together, but to be truthful I was unsure of whether we would actually follow up – our roles in this country are so different, our reasons for being so divergent. But they invited me on a hot day when I was restless to get away from my laptop, and so along I went, appreciative of the gesture. As we walked the women I was with ignored the little calls of “Hello!” and “Namaste,” and upon my commenting that I found it cute, laughed with a touch of sarcasm and said that that was, “one word for it.” I myself see that the calls can be redundant, and occasionally perhaps a touch obnoxious when they are repeated ad nauseum (sometimes you get the, “hellohellohellohellohello-hellohelloHELLOOOOOOOO!!!” kid, which, let’s face it, probably would have been me as a child), but to me it’s a window to a different perception of a bideshi, and an opportunity to open the door to communication with community members who watch carefully as you either acknowledge or ignore their beloved children.

Children are prized above all in Nepal, as are families. Nothing is as important as having a family, and nothing will come in the way of marriage, that all important first step to parenthood. My western views are therefore kept to myself unless I am asked for them explicitly, as to say you don’t plan to have children is like saying very seriously that you plan to birth monkeys – it simply cannot be understood, and isn’t even perceived as funny. For reasons that go far beyond the limits of access to birth control, having children does not occur to most Nepalis as something that is a matter of choice. And despite the fact that this leaves little room for me to be completely honest with those I meet about who I truly am, and my own desires regarding (not) having children, I find the dedication to family and to rearing offspring charming. This is a culture that knows what it wants – babies – and says so without reticence.

So to acknowledge a child, and especially one speaking a “foreign” language at such a young age, is to open a door to understanding, and friendship, with their parents, and to an interesting and potentially enjoyable interaction with the little kid. To ignore that same child…well it closes a door. Hard.

And imagine for a moment the converse – put yourself in the position of the local person, sitting on your property on a hot summer day in the States with your small child sitting next to you, who by some amazing bit of education and intellect is learning, let’s say, some Spanish. And there goes your three or four-year-old in a diaper (do three and four year olds wear diapers?), trotting across the lawn towards some folks walking up the street, who perhaps look Spanish, or perhaps don’t (it is irrelevant), and cheerfully greeting them with a big-eyed “HOLA!” and warming your heart. Now imagine that those people don’t even turn their heads from their conversation to acknowledge your beautiful, brilliant child, but continue walking without a glance of acknowledgment in your or your baby’s direction. You get the picture.

I must admit here – I absolutely bristle with anger just at writing about this behavior from my fellow bideshi.

And so on my walk with Deepak as with the Bideshi, I greeted everyone who greeted me, and was rewarded with the smiles of ancient old hajuraamas (grandmas), faces crinkling up into papery smiles, worn at the corners of the mouth with age and an abundance of sunshine, as their brilliant grandbabes toddled after me, shyly mumbling “namaste,” with hands folded in front of them as if in prayer, or else calling out a happy “hello!”

Despite the onerous heat I relished the walk through the countryside, and learning the names of all the plants, and how they are grown, even as I forgot the plant names with every new one learned. I learned that the giant eucalyptus plants which seem to be so randomly seeded across the landscape are in fact delineating the boundaries of property, lest the ownership of critical food crops be confused in their absence. I pulled immature rice grains from their little husks, and marveled at the guava, banana, corn, rice, mango, and eucalyptus growing in each family’s yards, along with the occasional buffalo (of aforementioned questionable species differentiation, from my suburban point of view), cows, chickens and goats. I’ve told Deepak that when, in a month’s time, the rice in his fields are ready for harvesting, I would very much like to help.

Our walk eventually took us to Lakeside, the touristy area, which I promise myself little relaxing trips to when I am a little overstressed or feel behind, but which I never follow up on. It’s like my pot of gold at the end of the rainbow to keep me pressing on when I am tired, but I rarely get there to do what I thought I would, and accept this as part and partial to my nature, and the way I approach my work. Yesterday was no exception to this rule. I was most tempted to sit at a café overlooking Phewa Tal (Tal is lake in Nepali), staring vacantly into the now-dark night, and drink something blended, tropical fruit-based, and cold (with perhaps just ali ali alcohol in it).

Instead I realized we would need to eat, as I was missing the dinner hour at the Ban Campus cafeteria, and saw as Deepak steered us towards a back alley, viewless, overly warm open-air restaurant that in my American foolishness, I had neglected to take into consideration that Deepak would not be able to afford (nor see any sense in paying for) the inflated prices for food that would be found along the lake’s perimeter. I had thought that I might pay for us both, but saw as I glanced longingly at the warmly-lit paper lanterns and stained wood of the upstairs balcony of “Caffe Concerto”  while we passed, that, like an American, Deepak would not go to a place where he could not afford to pay his own way. Perhaps that pride is universal. I found it endearing.

So instead, we each got the 750ml bottles of Tuborg that for me entails a perfect buzz-in-a-bottle, and chatted at length about field research, graduate school, and my project over curry. I am very lucky to have met Deepak, I thought as I sat there, because he is truly and 100% only interested in me as a new and very different friend, with a vantage point on the world that he is interested in learning about, and with whom he hopes to share the marvels of his home and country. Many times in Nepal I am spoken to exclusively by young men (as young as or younger than my younger brother!), which is frustrating only in that it’s so completely not the kind of attention I’m looking for, and turns the young women of about my age away from me. In starting friendships with men while abroad I am perennially naïve, and usually just glad for someone with whom to speak. Many women around my age who travel abroad will bring and wear a faux wedding ring for this very reason, but I find doing so disingenuous, and couldn’t fill the story in when prompted to talk about my “husband” if I tried. And so I have become known around Ban Campus for being not just American, but of marrying age and single.

Deepak and I met for the first time in a little corrugated-metal-roofed shop just outside the campus gates, where I had gone for a cold soda (anything cold!) and he was lingering after a day’s work. He asked me exclusively about my research, and did not have a thing to say or ask about my marital status, existence as a solo researcher, or age. I liked him immediately, but was still wary of wrong impressions, and worse, of potentially damaging my burgeoning friendships with faculty here by somehow accidentally ending up dating (or, more likely, romantically perplexing) one of their students. Instead I requested what amounted to a reference check from the faculty members I’ve come to know, very blatantly and well-meaningly inquiring as to whether they thought I’d find myself in a bad situation and be misinterpreted if I spent time with him alone, as a friend. I told Deepak I had done this last night, to his amusement, which is the only reason I feel comfortable writing it here.

The faculty said they thought I would be fine, however, and so here we were, sitting in the dark, swatting mosquitoes, and talking about social science research and sampling methods (do you ask questions of everyone in the household? Do you just ask the men questions? How do you get the women to answer the questions? How did the Professor choose the villages? What’s the most interesting thing you’ve learned so far? How do they use the money they make doing community forestry?) It was pretty fun, and a nice way to end the day. As we walked back the pavement literally sizzled and steamed with the most recent drizzle of rain, and I felt the heat coming off of it in thick waves. I asked if we could take a taxi (which are an expensive 400 rupees, or almost $6) back to Ban Campus, as after the Tuborg I had had to pee, but sans flashlight hadn’t been able to bring myself to enter into the miniature barn-like stall where the squat toilet hole was, outside and alongside the restaurant. I didn’t say as much about having to pee, but Deepak took my cue and asked me, very sincerely, “Are you suffering long, or short?”

I gave a little snort of laughter, and said I wasn’t quite “suffering,” exactly, and what did he mean by long or short? Apparently in Nepali if you have to urinate you are suffering “short” (for the time you will spend in the bathroom), and should you have to defecate, well then you’d be in for the long suffering. I loved this, and burst out into little chuckles as we walked along looking for a taxi. When one eventually came I let Deepak do the negotiating (almost everything is negotiable in Nepal), and when the driver said 350 rupees (a not unfair price), I played my part of bideshi to perfection, urging Deepak to continue walking with me until the driver reneged, and brought the price down to 300Rs (about $4). Damn those crafty tourists, eh?

All in all it was an excellent end to a long day, and very enjoyable. When I returned to the hostel, however, it was HOT. And dark, as the lights had gone again, and there was no knowing when they would be back. I used my cell phone as a flashlight as I opened the padlock to my apartment, and speculated as to whether cellulars are used more often in Nepal as flashlight, or as phone. Probably the former. I headed into my room and flipped my little maglite on, setting it up as a little lantern, and opened ‘Shadows on the Grass,’ the accompaniment to ‘Out of Africa,’ which I hadn’t had the heart to start the night before after finishing the latter work, as I lay on my bed, face in the fan, choked up with sobs for poor Karen Blixen and her now long-lost adopted country, and many lost friends.

In short order, however, the heat sans fan became intolerable, and I could neither sit nor lie on the bed without being overwhelmingly overheated. And so I, in a moment of divine inspiration, made my way into the bathroom in tank top and underwear, turned on the shower head, and stepped giddily into it like the little girl of my childhood, who delighted in running into sprinklers fully dressed. Once completely soaked I headed back towards my room, still dripping with water and not the least bit interested in rubbing any of it off with my towel, laid right down on my bed, and felt straight to sleep, little beads of water left to their own devices as they began to evaporate off of my skin.

-M-

‘Out of Africa,’ Into Nepal

I am reading Out of Africa in Nepal. I realized this morning that it seems to be a habit of mine to read books about Africa while in other places, beautiful places which, were it not for the book, I would otherwise be intensely focused on.

I finished Barbara Kingsolver’s Poisonwood Bible (an excellent book) in Yosemite National Park’s Tuolomne Meadows several years back, in the days when I lived in a tent in the Sierra, and worked for the Forest Service. I remember how at the time I had to literally pull myself away from the end of the book as I sat on the bank of a little river there, separating myself from the work with a great shuddering inhalation of revival as I tried to come to terms with what the story had meant to me, and the way in which it had ended. I very clearly recall my surroundings – I had hidden myself away on the low, sandy part of the bank, so that casual viewers from the road would be unable to see my sitting along the side of the water, tucked down just low enough to become only a bump in the landscape. I recall as well exactly what the sky looked like, bright blue with low, rounded cumulus clouds as white as cotton against the sky.  As I regained awareness of my own presence and geographic place in the world, I raised my head and looking around me saw that I was, in fact, still in Yosemite. I appreciated how much more clearly I saw where I was and the opportunities that lay in front of me, back then, and Out of Africa has had much of the same effect on me in Nepal.

I brought several books with me this summer, many of which spent their year in a “to read” pile on my futon in New Haven, waiting for a day that never came. A few (including Out of Africa) I went out and bought specifically for this trip, knowing and hoping that I would encounter technology-free downtime, and that when sleeping outdoors or in places of modest accommodation, they would the perfect little gift to myself, a pathway to sleep and also to distraction, if needed. Among those I’ve brought from the futon pile but not yet read were Eiger Dreams, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, and an autographed copy of Vandana Shiva’s Water Wars. Each made the cut for the trip for a different reason, each one included in order to serve a different purpose. Eiger Dreams, a collection of stories about mountain climbing was a gift from Cristi, prescient in its subject matter, which seemed an appropriate read for someone so close to the Himalaya; Pedagogy of the Oppressed was recommended and loaned by my friend Gabe from Yale after a late night of debating social change and politics over glasses of wine; Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes was assigned (whoops!) for my Social Science Theory and Methods class in the fall, but didn’t seem relevant to my own work until very recently; and Water Wars I bought from the author herself when the Progressive Student Union I worked with as an undergraduate hosted her as a speaker, but I had previously put it down after beginning to read it because I didn’t know enough about the geography and places being referenced in India. Almost five years later now, I do know them, and am perhaps incidentally very interested in the subject of water access and availability in South Asia. And so it came along too.

The books I purchased for the occasion were of the same vein, in that there was no discernable central theme. Michael Pollan’s Omnivore’s Dilemma was supposed to be Botany of Desire, because a friend reading it at a research site years ago (I can no longer recall whether it was in Minnesota or California) raved about its contents. But when I opened Botany of Desire in the bookstore and saw one of the first chapters was all about apples, I simply didn’t feel it was what I was looking for, on this particular trip. I remember the first time I heard about Omnivore’s Dilemma, when my friend Emily at National Geographic, who I loved to pieces for our rapid-fire intellectual give-and-take, sent me an email one morning containing only the excerpt the NYTimes published, along with her thoughts on his dietary recommendations, which went as follows: Eat Food. Not too Much. Mostly Plants.

Everything Michael Pollan has written has come highly-recommended to me, over the years, and Omnivore’s Dilemma thus seemed a nice follow-on to Kingsolver’s Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, which was an incredible and thought-provoking book that I read last summer. My mother, in fact, probably still has it on her bedside table, where she left it after getting bogged down in the decidedly slow first chapter (which I warned her would happen…mom!)

Bird by Bird, which has a subtitle along the lines of Stories on Writing and Life, has come into and out of my life so many times that I considered it a matter of fate to pick it up, and laughed at the irony of it all when it came out of my backpack simply masticated by the sheer volume of things I had crammed in there with it. ‘Shitty First Drafts,’ Anne Lamott’s chapter about getting started as a writer, and the necessity of writing crap to get to the good stuff, was assigned to me in my undergraduate Writing Colleagues seminar, and five years later I’ve trucked the little paper photocopy all over the planet with me, trying to provoke myself into writing down some of the things I think as I experience the world. I brought it to Costa Rica last year hoping that I would take the opportunity to do some more substantial writing, and instead stumbled across the entire book on a bookswap shelf in a local coffeeshop, one lazy afternoon last summer in Puerto Jimenez, Costa Rica. I had no book with me I was willing to swap, however, and since the swap terms were clear and firm, I instead sat in place and read several chapters, becoming increasingly enamored with the work and the author until I left town, vowing to acquire my own copy in short order.

Out of Africa was a little bit different. I saw the end of the movie version of Out of Africa over one of the fall or winter holidays at my parents’ house this year, and was immensely moved by the story, the incredible, adventurous, determined, strong woman of whom it told, and the bittersweet ending to her experience abroad. I was moved as well by the relationships she shared in the Ngong hills of Africa, both with an array of other foreigners, and with the local tribes she comes to know, understand, protect and respect. Few movies affect me so deeply, and I found that in the weeks and months afterwards my thoughts often returned to Karen Blixen, and my desire to read her full story, in her own words. I knew the moment the movie finished that I would buy the book and read it closely, and find now that while I read it, as I did with the Poisonwood Bible, I often take leave of the book for a moment, closing its covers with a finger in place to hold the page, and clasp it unconsciously to my chest with a gasp, I am so moved by her story. The descriptiveness of the imagery, and the self-identification I feel with the narrator, rivets me, despite not being half the woman, or having half the courage, that she does.

When Blixen writes of standing and watching Denys Finch-Hatton (who I believe will become her lover, but I’m only on page 236 so don’t tell me!) in the dark after he’d shot two lions, and of how her hands had shaken while holding the torch guiding his rifle, despite her desire to be brave, and the way he gently, dryly, teased her for it later, the writing was so lucid I felt as if it were I who was in the moment, and could feel exactly the energy and affection with which she must have looked over at Denys, thrilled by the kill and the moment they shared there together, as true equals in the dark of an African night. Such gorgeous writing, and beautiful, inspirational, larger-than-life people.

It moves me too to think of how they must have felt leaving for a life in Africa, struggling to make a living and earn enough to keep their farm estates, while friends and family back home blazed forward in the comfort of the Industrial Age, never completely understanding what it was that they had experienced. Blixen writes of how her peers told her they felt a little bit like they had abandoned their country and communities at home, but were in fact fellow exiles, to her mind, and again I can relate so closely that it gives me pause, to let my mind wander a bit, and think about the choices we make in life, before returning to my reading. I think it is an important part of spending time abroad to wonder where you actually fit best, and to question whether there’s a culture or a place in the world that suits your nature more closely than the one you are born into.

Such a fantastic, thought-provoking book, and one which even as it pulls me into Africa gives me cause to think more deeply about Nepal, and about the way people of different cultures and expectations interact with one another when brought into the same small spaces. My experience in Nepal is sixteen and three quarters of a year shorter in duration, and drastically different than that of Blixen in Africa, but I take great solace in the small parallels between our experiences, and in her articulate, poetic expression of sentiments I could myself only stammer out, if I could articulate them at all.