Category Archives: Self-Discovery

Not Quite Pocket Change

Yesterday before it had rained in the mid-afternoon I took a break from my laptop, and sat with the women who run the cafeteria under the trees that are adjacent to it, on the little plastic seats where a mix of students, faculty, and staff seek solace from the sun. One of the women who runs the cafeteria is particularly friendly to me, but I find her Nepali perhaps the most unintelligible of all, and so we often pass the time asking one another questions in Nepali, and not understanding one another’s questions or answers.

Still, it’s a nice place to sit and be outside for awhile, and on this particular day (Sunday) they were serving a momo mid-day snack. Momo is a tasty treat for Nepalis that excites them the way Americans get excited about pizza, and consists of a vegetable or meat dumpling dressed in achar, or pickled sauce. The momo is from the Tibetan tradition and I believe came over with the refugees here. Today’s sauce was particularly good, a tomato achar somewhere between a more flavorful hot sauce and homemade ketchup.

As I sat there and pondered the clouds, looking for rain, Deepak came along, ordered some momo himself, and began to finally translate for the didi (older woman) who works in the kitchen. And I was really surprised by what she said.

The woman said that she was wondering if I would be able to help her pay for school for her son, who is her only child, and fatherless. I was flabbergasted, although perhaps unnecessarily. After some clarification through Deepak (who was himself put in an uncomfortable situation), I ascertained that this woman thought that perhaps I could help by finding the money from an NGO, any NGO, or through some grant, or scholarship, or agency, or really anything that might be affiliated with my country and the resources those from within it commandeer. When, curious, I asked Deepak how much money she needed, he told me 5,000Rs per year to send the boy to school, including the cost of attendance, books, and the schoolbus. Which sounds like it must be a ton of money, right? It’s $66 USD.

And my first thought, of course, was to play the hero. I could go to my room right now, and get that money. I had it, this incredible sum that this poor woman (who is in fact very poor) needs, on hand, and could dispense it to her at will. The only impact to me would be not being able to travel to Kathmandu in order to take a weekend off in the middle of the summer. Instead of the amount she needs per year, she said, the cost of attendance alone would also help her. That amount is 1,500 rupees per year, or 6,000 more rupees for him to finish through grade 10, which is when the school here ends. For $80 right this second I could walk over to the school’s administrative office, pay out $80 right now, right now, and guarantee this little boy four more years of his education, through which he might someday be able to work in a good enough job to give his mom a break from washing cafeteria dishes, and move them out of the cafeteria itself, where they sleep on the tables during the night.

I can hear my big-hearted friends pulling out their checkbooks right now, and with a grin imagine in particular Caroline and Sarah, and Jose, running the diminuitive numbers, as they are each tremendous for being doers when they see an opportunity. I know what you are thinking, and love you for it, but it’s more complicated than that.

When the woman asked for support for her son, she was sitting next to another woman, who also works and lives in the cafeteria, and who has five children, herself. That woman had managed to obtain support for her childrens’ education through an NGO in Lakeside, because she is so poor, but she also has put 2 or 3 of these children in an orphanage, because she cannot care for them herself. And so the question grows. Do I give this second woman money for her children, too? And if so, is it money to live on (so she can get her children back) or money for their education (which is currently paid for)? Why can’t the first woman get money for her own child, if the second woman did? Is she not poor enough? Does that mean there are other even poorer families, who might need it more?

And if I go back to my room and bring out the money to pay for one or both, then what will happen if they tell their friends, the scores of other staff who make this campus what it is, but who also live in the modest staff apartments on campus and struggle to provide for their children and families? Where is my line? Who do I help?

And it is here where I take my leave of the woman, promising to think it over and try to come up with who I know that might be able to help. Even though I am the person I know who might be able to help. And the question expands again: what is the scale of the aid I would hope to be able to provide? What is meaningful help? How do you decide, in the face of so many with limited resources, who is most deserving? Is it the woman who is brave enough to ask when she sees the slender possibility of a chance in front of her, or is it based on some kind of merit scale? And who gets to decide?

There are two directions I want this post to go in. One is about my own future, and one is this woman’s. I will wait on the part about my own future, at present, and instead ask for your advice.

To be explicit: I don’t know what to do here, with this question, and the kindly mother in question keeps shooting me hopeful looks whenever I enter the cafeteria. Do you save, or help, the one woman or family you know? Or do you create the foundation or organization that can work to help so many others, and start with that self-same funding you didn’t give to the woman who asked? How do you decide? And if you help the one, then why not the other? And if not the other, why not all? And if not all, then how do you decide who is “worth” helping? And if you decide who is worth helping based on a meritocracy, then how do you justify that first bit of funding, given because your heart was weak, and open, and willing? Where in the process of giving aid to people who need it do you begin to take away their ability to help themselves? When is aid an encumberment, and not a support? How do people learn to help themselves?

I don’t have the answers. Right now, I am overwhelmed by the scope of the questions. I invite your insight. I know any one of you could fund this kid straight through high school, and that any readers here would, at the drop of a hat, and in particular at my request. My question to you now is, should we?

And to those who see it in the cards already, the flip side, the “me” in the question is…I have been contemplating starting my own non-profit, both focused on conservation and poverty alleviation, possibly in collaboration with Kanchan. Yes, you probably saw through it. Would you help me do it, if I tried? If your gut answer is yes, do you mean it, in terms of a long-term commitment? What if it meant a three year investment? What if I wanted you on my board? What kind of help are you yourselves able and willing to provide? Where are your own lines?

There are no wrong answers, only an abundance of thoughtful questions – xonsider this a thought exercise. Right now that’s all it is, but it does strike me that it could easily become much, much more.

-M-

A Little Piece of Perfection

Yesterday was a pitch perfect day, and one I relished, after so much frustration with the computer and desk-based part of my research. I have been spending untold amounts of time indoors right now, finalizing decisions about my research plan, timeline, and most importantly, field sites, hovering over three topo maps of Kaski District (in which Pokhara and the Institute of Forestry are located), for more time than I’d like to admit, with less to show for it than I expected. I wasn’t down, per se, but I needed a good day. And that is exactly what I got.

At long last, I feel like I’m starting to get there with my fieldwork prep, and am hoping to spend much less time on my laptop and indoors as of late this week, when I’ll head into the field to do a practice run on my sampling methods, and see how it goes, how long it takes, and what I need to change. The forests are so close I can taste them. Kind of.

Yesterday started out pretty normally, what with me being forced out of bed by the intense and oppressive heat, which seems to seep in through the windows and under my door shortly before 8 am every day. I generally try to begin my day at 7, so as to maximize my time before breakfast at 10. Everyone else calls the first meal of the day “lunch,” but since it’s all daal bhaat all the time, you may as well call it dinner for all it really matters. Despite two fans going at all times, sucking up Nepal’s limited electricity and spitting it back at me in the form of regular waves of warm air pulsing in my direction, I haven’t managed to stay in bed past 8. The sun comes up at around 5 or 5:30 in the morning, so the day is bright and well-begun by the time I can bring myself to roll out of bed and under the showerhead, where I briefly rinse off before beginning my day. Most of the Nepalis have by this time been up since the dawning of sun, and many will have gone for exercise, walking or jogging through the streets of the city while they’re still quiet, or to the little temple adjacent to my building, for Puja (prayer). Sometimes both.

I spent a little bit of time posting two excessively long old blog posts, answered some email, and downloaded a proposal I’d promised to edit for a professor friend here. I am becoming quite the editor of various faculty and administrators’ writing, and as I type there sits next to me on the table what I understand to be a newspaper article, titled ‘Agriculture in Nepal,’ which awaits my review. I’m not spending an excessive amount of time doing this editing, but it seems to me that to help with something that comes so easily to me is to do a very small favor for a community of people who have welcomed me very warmly. And so, I edit. A lot.

After daal bhaat (and it was paneer daal bhaat, which means a type of cheese – score!), I returned to my quarters and did a bit of editing, becoming restless (and sweaty) as the morning and the heat proceeded, hand in hand. I was thinking about how I needed to find somewhere else to go to do writing and work, sometime soon, because as it is now when I stay here in the guesthouse apartment to do work on my computer, I am attached to the wall by ethernet cord (an unfamiliar feeling for an American), making me feel glued to one particular seat in our common area, which in turn makes me even more agitated than I might otherwise be. The tables here are short, coffee-table-style, so there are few good ways to set up a computer for typing, and I often end up with my laptop on my lap, which is simply torturous for the amount of heat the thing gives off. Way to go, Apple.

But yesterday, shortly after completing the proposal review – on which I think I did a very good job, to be truthful, and through which I realized how much I’ve learned this year – Professor Singh-sir, one of the professors who has been kind and accommodating in helping me out around campus, came by and helped me think through my field site selection a bit (I am looking to sample twelve different forests, and they have to be of approximately the same species composition, facing the same compass direction, at approximately the same elevation, and reasonably close to one another – no mean feat), which was exactly what I needed as I sat struggling to push through a mental block in my thinking on sites. Professor Singh-sir helped me outline my next steps and filled in the blanks on who I would need to talk to to do so, and then invited me to a gathering at his house at 5 (by which he meant 6 in Nepali time) of the academic community’s “women’s group.” He made clear to me this wasn’t a gathering of the students, but of the women of the community – mostly professors’ wives, but with a few professors and female staff members thrown in as well.

I was touched and pleased to be invited, as my own company has been a little redundant, at present, and decided that since almost all of the professor’s wives would be wearing kurta suruwal, the traditional dress of a long shirt (it goes to mid-thigh), balloon-like cotton pants, and a scarf worn backwards over the shoulders (so the ends are both hanging down your back and the middle curves around your neckline, almost like a necklace made of wispy scarf material), that I would, too. I had purchased three kurta suruwal the last time I was in Nepal, so that I could wear them in the villages while doing my field research. I’m unclear at present as to whether this is a necessary and beneficial step, but was relieved at present to get out of my sweat-soaked jeans (which I’ve been wearing rolled to just below the knees, for propriety), and into some billowy cotton fabric which would breath much more easily. I had been contemplating wearing kurta suruwal for days, but the students here dress very much like students would in the contemporary US (with the exception of a “New Kids on the Block” t-shirt I caught sight of in the cafeteria this morning – a little behind on the times) and the young women do not themselves wear kurta. So it seemed a little bit bizarre to wear one myself among so many young women who dress like me, the bideshi.

At the appointed hour, then, I donned my very pretty aquamarine blue kurta, pinned up my hair, matched a set of earrings that were a gift from Kathayoon for my birthday, and quite self-consciously strode out and down the little row of professors’ and staff apartments, which are arrayed as condos would be along a narrow street, each constructed after the same exact model but enhanced and adorned by the owner’s plants, motorcycles, and children playing in the yards. As I went I was very conscious of the members of various families stepping to the front doors and windows to see the campus bideshi wandering down their way in her kurta, probably wondering how I had come across one in such a large size. I kept my shoulders back, and head up despite my slight self-consciousness, and met Professor Singh outside his apartment, where he helped to re-connect me to one of the young women scientists here, who is very, very good at what she does, and whose father is on the staff at IOF. It was very nice to see her (although I felt a bit goofy and oversized in my American-size kurta), and with Professor Singh-sir’s encouragement, we both made our way into the women’s group event, which turned out to be a mothers’ group.

Mothers’ groups are ubiquitous in Nepal, particularly in the villages. Becoming a member (and thus a mother) is a point of incredible pride in Nepali culture, and in fact the word for “woman” is traditionally not applied to a woman until she is married. So if you never marry, or you marry late in life, you would traditionally still be referred to as a “girl.” The same goes for men, who are boys until they marry. So you can have a 35 year old “boy” and a 16 year-old “woman,” but I, who have been referring to myself as a “woman” since a particularly thoughtful decision when I was 23 or 24, am still a “girl” here. I actually took the time to explain to my friend Deepak (a boy) the other day whereabouts the line is between “girl” and “woman” in western culture, and why calling an independent, confident, competent woman like myself a girl is a little bit insulting, when it happens in my own country. When it happens in Nepal, though, it’s obviously just fine.

So with little ceremony but a lot of jittery nerves, Neeru and I stepped out of our own shoes and past the large pile of shiny flip-flops and sandals that mark the doorway of a women’s gathering, and stepped into a dherai garmi (very warm) room fully of happily chatting, kurta suruwal-clad women, sitting on the floor with legs folded, leaning up against one another’s knees, and generally sprawled throughout the room in a little grouping of happy motherhood, catching up with one another and chatting animatedly until we entered, and the room fell silent. It was a little like being adopted by about twenty “aunties” at once, as I looked around and saw to my relief the familiar and friendly faces of professors’ wives I’d already met, including three I know somewhat well. Neeru shepherded me towards a seat on the fringe of the group, and very kindly took questions from those who had not yet met me, to give me a moment to gather my thoughts (and speaking skills) before debuting some pretty mediocre Nepali in front of all of these wonderful, beautifully dressed older women.

But debut those mediocre Nepali skills I did, and stammered through a weak introduction of myself in Nepali, while they all sat quietly listening and observing, until Neeru very generously took over, and added the relevant details I’d neglected to mention, like that I’m a graduate student, I’m here for research, I’m from “Ale University,” etc. The women there were all very warm and friendly, and as I watched and normal conversation resumed, they took turns making contributions to a fund they use to do charitable works and to learn crafts, writing each contribution down into a large book, and putting their 200 rupees monthly donation ($2.60, or half the cost of a full day’s work by a field assistant) into a plastic bag at one woman’s feet. It was pretty interesting, to tell the truth, and I honed in on as much of the Nepali conversation as I could.

Adults in Nepal are much more flexible than in the United States, easily and comfortably sprawling on the floor or leaning up against a seated friend’s knees while sitting in a group. Nepali men and women, boys and girls, are much more touchy-feely than Americans are, which I think is tremendous. Boys here walk around holding hands, or, cuter, with their arms around each other’s shoulders and waists, as a sign of friendship, as do girls. Men and women would generally not walk holding hands or arm in arm unless they were married, but they do so extensively with their own gender. It seems like it would make friendships within your own gender closer (try arguing with someone you just had your arms wrapped around, or were holding hands with), and probably fills in the gaps in touch and human contact that Americans fill with lovers and boyfriends before marriage. I find it really nice, and was always really grateful when Kanchan would take my hand in hers in Kathmandu before we crossed the street. Without that hand to hold, I may well have taken a taxi to the other side, my first few days in Nepal, and would definitely have risked being hit by one of the dozens of motorized and quasi-mechanized conveyances that Nepalis employ. Beyond safety, though, its just nice. Human contact is never really a bad thing.

At the women’s event I sat quietly next to Neeru for awhile, making conversation and straining to catch the rapid-fire conversation of my Nepali hostess and her friends, which turned out to be the problem of disposing of plastic, and how to manage garbage here. A subject after my own heart (ah, garbage!), it is always great to hear people talking about how to resolve environmental issues in their own communities, and it was a lot of fun to kind of “listen in” on. While we listened and chatted we were brought little metal plates called thali full of all kinds of Nepali khana (food): a kind of beaten rice that ends up dry and crunchy, about the size of popcorn; a thin, dry, papery bread akin to what you’d have in Indian food restaurants, which is my favorite because it is surprisingly flavorful; three totally American-style store-bought cookies with vanilla frosting in the middle; and a final small Nepali item that eludes me at the moment. It was a lot of food, and was accompanied by sliced mangos (of which I ate a whopping five yesterday!); ciya, or tea with milk and more sugar than I care to acknowledge; and glasses of “juice” that were really water with something akin to Tang mixed in. It was absolutely lovely, and I ate all of it.

After a short while I filled the women of the community in on Rajesh, one of my peers and a friend from the Forestry School, who had emailed me that he had shaken the hand of Hillary Clinton at Yale’s graduation. We had a funny moment when I asked if the women gathered knew of Hillary Clinton (as I knew they must), and everyone looked confused until Neeru “translated,” affecting a Nepali accent and translating ‘Hillary Clinton’ from English, to English. Upon which everyone smiled knowingly, and proudly. I was glad to be able to share news with them about a member of their community of whom they are so proud, and it has been fun to see how everyone here and there is connected. Another friend from my class is half Nepali, and one day I was eating breakfast at the house of a faculty member here, and he said he went to the University of Maine Orono, where that classmate’s father is on the faculty. On a whim, I asked him if he perhaps knew a Professor Pendse, or his daughter Sabina, and fifteen minutes later I was staring at a very current photo of my friend from the US, who I later emailed at her internship in Italy to tell her I’d seen the picture, and that I’d met the family. It is indeed a small world, after all.

After eating at the party Neeru and I took a walk to a lookout point that I don’t know how to spell but which is pronounced “Too-toong-gah,” a deep gorge formed by the Setikhola (Seti river) carving its way through Pokhara. It’s a pretty lookout point at which many people gather as the day ends, and we sat there happily talking about field research and field inventories in our kurta suruwals, connected by our dorky passion for measuring trees. Neeru is a pretty, diminuitive woman with nervous eyes, who absolutely comes alive while discussing forest science. This woman is so capable. I am in awe of her, and many of the other students here. She pulled facts, measurements, dimensions, and tree species out of thin air, is familiar with the Village Development Committees (VDCs) managing the community forests all over the valley, and just really knows her stuff. It’s an amazing thing to watch someone who has really found their space in the world as they so completely own it, and I am incredibly glad for her guidance and companionship.

As we sat there a younger male student named Bishwa came along, who had invited me to that same spot earlier in the day, but who I assumed had forgotten to call me before he came, when in fact he was just operating on Nepali time. Bishwa looked perhaps a little bummed I hadn’t accompanied him to see Tootoonggah for the first time, but cheered up a bit when I asked him to join us in the sitting, and inquired as to how he liked his new American music. A day or two before Bishwa had traded me a pirated copy of ‘Caravan,’ a gorgeous movie filmed in Nepal that was, as any Nepali you bring it up with will tell you, nominated for an Academy Award (as well it should have been). I in turn gave Bishwa some funky music (Aretha Franklin and Ani Difranco) and some of the pop I’ve gotten from Kathayoon this year, because he kept asking me questions about American bands and pop culture I hadn’t heard or listened to since high school – Linkin’ Park, anybody?

I gave him what could easily be termed the “Anti-V-Day playlist,” for those who know what I’m referring to, which is to say a mix compiled for a party the girls of my house threw this past Valentine’s Day. It’s a saccharine sweet, pop-princess meets electronica mix that’s fun to dance to, which I thought would suit his tastes well (Bishwa told me he likes Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, and I think Celine Dion when I first met him – I really didn’t know what to say in response). I exercised just enough tact not to pass along such 827 favorites as “I Kissed a Girl” and “Take Me on the Floor,” but did give him a sampling of Lily Allen, including “LDN.” And let me tell you, it’s an unfortunate moment when a sweetheart of a Nepali kid (he’s 22) asks you to translate the lyric, “fella lookin’ dapper when his sitting with his napper then I see it’s a pimp and his crackwhore.”

Regrettable lyrics aside (thanks Lily), it was a really pleasant, nice ending to an enjoyable afternoon, and I was delighted to be reunited with Neeru, and to have coincidentally met up with Bishwa. Upon returning to campus I headed off to the cafeteria to catch the tail end of dinner, and met up with Professor Abadesh Singh-sir and his wife (my hostess in the afternoon), and walked with them in the cooling air, a distinctly Nepali habit. All the professors and their wives (who dress up for the occasion) go out walking in the evening, strolling through the campus and sometimes out onto the main streets as well, to get some exercise and enjoy the air. Professor Singh-sir had that day gone to the locksmith to get me a set of keys to his program’s office, which was created with Yale’s support, and where I am now pleased to be able to work.

And the night went on this way. From Neeru I had joined Professor Singh-sir, and from Professor Singh-sir and his wife I encountered the M.Sc. students who are my level and who dined in the cafeteria at the same time I did. We’d just begun to become friends when they’d invited me to stop by earlier this week, to my great delight, and on this night I ran into Deepa, one of the women, and two of her male friends. I felt a little bit nervous because I was still in my kurta and they were in a tshirt and jeans, but they said hello and told me my kurta was nice. I told them I had wanted to wear one of the kurtas for days, but felt silly wearing one when they themselves didn’t, at which Deepa came over and took me by the hand, and told me they had just been discussing how beautiful I looked, like a proper Nepali. And my heart just soared. Not because of looking beautiful in a kurta, or being a proper Nepali (okay maybe a little about being a proper Nepali), but because it was just the most wonderful day from top to bottom. I feel so at home on this campus, where I so obviously was not actually at home in the least, and so glad to have ended up here.

From Deepa and her friends I went to the cafeteria, and the cafeteria ladies I had met earlier in the day greeted me with excitement about my kurta, asking me where I had purchased it, telling me it was very nice, etc. It was such fun. After a quick dinner of daal bhaat and a few more kind comments from the cafeteria staff (who think I am either very, very, funny, or a little bit weird – perhaps both), I headed back to my guesthouse, where I was met by Deepak, who had been calling me to no avail, as that particular kurta was sewn without pockets. He called into my open door while I was washing some clothes in a bucket in the bathroom, and when bid to enter came in to encounter me there, sweaty, doing laundry Nepali-style, and clad in a kurta, and was, suffice it to say, very surprised. He told me I made a “Ramro Nepali keti” (good or nice Nepali girl), and we decided on impulse to take his motorcycle for a ride in the dark (very slowly, he promised) and go buy some beer to bring back to the guesthouse.

Fifteen minutes later we were gliding slowly through the dark of night, stars clear in the sky above, motorcycle creating little cooling currents of wind, me in a kurta suruwal, and it was all I could do to think, “Is this really my life?” I put my head back and looked up at the stars as we rolled around through the dark of a rare cloudless night in Pokhara, cool breeze blowing through my hair, passing looming pipal and bari trees, under which the people usually come to rest and talk,. Cows slept, huking dark masses along the sides of the streets, dogs barked lazily in the lanes, and the occasional other motorcycle passed quickly through the dark. It was, suffice it to say, absolutely perfect. All I could think while on the back of the bike was how much I wanted to hold onto the perfection that was that afternoon, and savor it as a memory worth coming back to time and time again.

-M-

For Love of Trees

These have of late been some very long days of working at my computer, hunched over the little tables in the common space of the guesthouse, doing work on and off the internet to make sure my research plan will be both feasible and fruitful. Tonight after a long, long, long day in the very 70’s style lounge chair that has effectively constituted a “desk chair” for my work here I found I was in serious need of a break, and feeling a little low in spirit due to the slow rate of progress in my research. As I paused for a moment to lean back over the spongy plastic of the seat to crack and stretch my back, I noticed with pleasure that the wind had picked up and was beginning to blow through the open windows, at long last cooling the damp tendrils of hair which have clung to the back of my neck almost since I landed in Nepal. It was going to rain.

I have had an intense love of precipitation in all its splendid forms for as long as I can remember, and have never seen a storm I did not like. I am a particular fan of rain and snow, especially when accompanied by lightning, thunder, or hail, and have always struggled to understand the people who groan as it commences. To me, weather is magical, and to wish it away…bad juju, at the very least. The weather is one of so few remaining sources of change that we humans have not yet brought to heel – I hope we never, ever come to control the climate. To my mind, having so few things against which man is powerless induces a kind of cockiness into our species, which makes us fallible. Instead we need and should crave these regular doses of nature’s power to put us back in our place which, to my mind, should not always be at the top. Rainy wedding days be damned – Fred Astaire and Ginger Roberts had it right – we need to learn to stop trying to always be perfectly in control, and spend more time out dancing in the rain.

And so, eager to see, smell, taste, and maybe even dance in the rain myself, I closed my computer and walked outside and along the forest’s perimeter as the wind picked up, watching how the air blew through the treetops, testing the strength of nascent leaf stems and revealed the white underbellies of leaves while my hair danced with eager anticipation over my head, delightfully out of my control. This wind, the fierce, indefatigable column of air that was moving around me, made me feel as if the world sighed with relief at the promise of a good quenching rainfall, when the sky darkened, and then waited with baited breath as the gift it sought was withheld. There would be no rain.

Instead of dancing in the rain, then, I turned in towards the forest, which flanks my guesthouse windows and the hillside behind the forestry school, and stared into it, hard. At the time I was completely unaware of the intensity of my concentration, but stood looking slowly over the ground and plant-life the forest contains, eyes roaming up, and over, and through the various layers of strata, thinking about the plants and trees and secrets it held.

I was recalling a conversation I had with my friend Jesse from school, shortly before we all parted ways for the summer. We had somewhat tangentially been talking about careers in the field and how they related (or don’t) to careers in the office, as well as the difficulty of choosing effectively between the two paths. Either I or Jesse (I no longer remember which of us it was) commented that the more you learn about the field you love, the more training and education you obtain in your area of specialization, the farther you remove yourself from the source of your passion, and the reason you selected that field to begin with. To develop professional know-how, attend well-known universities, and work effectively for organizations and offices with strong brand associations is to send yourself farther and farther into the offices and the policy and the management and paperwork, and turn decidedly away from the hiking boots, campfires, field culture, and community of field scientists that made you choose this life’s work when you began it. It is a decision I am loathe to make, but one which confronts us all. To be promoted, in professional conservation work, is to go increasingly far from the things and places which are most dear.

My long look into the forest also made me think of what we students referred to as “TNC Day,” this semester, when staffers and the president of the Nature Conservancy descended upon our brand new eco-friendly school building, Kroon Hall, and did presentations on their work, their approach, and what it is like to work for TNC. I attended several parts of the larger event, including a lunchtime panel discussion attended by both the organization’s bigwigs and some of the state-level staff. In commenting on the presentation being given, for a warm up laugh, one of the presenters pointed to a compelling image of a happily bubbling, back-lit brook in a forest, and said, “I’m sure this speaks to everyone here, but it’s not exactly what our day’s work entails. When we made this powerpoint yesterday, we were talking about how long its been since any of us have seen anything like this.” And as I watched, the other panel members chuckled wryly, and nodded in agreement.

It’s funny how stuff like that sticks with you. Instead of feeling amusement at a sentiment I can certainly relate to, I felt a mild degree of horror, and a strong impulse to run the other way, away from everything (environmental nonprofit management and conservation in particular) I have been so single-mindedly moving towards. I already know well how, once in a cubicle, surrounded by piles of paper, working on one of many small projects and trying to maximize your efforts and hours to achieve one tiny conservation goal for one small place, group, or organization, it is so easy to forget why you got yourself into conservation to begin with. How quickly one loses track of why the condition of the natural environment matters, and why it matters to you.

So perhaps it wasn’t so strange that as I stood there looking at the forest, I thought to myself, almost as a reassurance, “this is why I actually came here. Because I love the trees.” And it was a good and timely reminder, for sitting for days upon days while hunched over a computer, overheating in the sweltering weather while your hiking boots become stationary obstacles for your bedroom’s rodent community, is not in the least inspiring. But forests – forests I can get behind. Forests are so deep, and beautiful, and mysterious, with innumerable processes happening at any one time, most of them invisible to our human eyes until we train them to search them out. I have been moved by forests since I was a child, and have sought to study forest ecology since the very first day I realized how much of a source of inspiration they are, for me.

I remember how during college I stood out on the sandy point of an outcropping in the Galapagos Islands, in the midst of unbelievable natural beauty, warm weather, cool breeze, and brilliant, brilliant blue ocean, and felt the absence of…something…so keenly.  I couldn’t name it, at first, but for its absence I  disliked the Galapagos, and couldn’t emotionally engage with them the way my friends did. It wasn’t until a few days later, when we drove up into the highlands of one of the occupied islands to see Lonesome George, the last land tortoise of his species, and passed through the low elevation forests of that island, that I could put my finger on what it was that had been missing. I was missing the trees.

And I am not a fan of just any old tree. I am a fan of the interestingly symmetrical ones, the outlandishly large and proud ones, the kind I can climb, and those that sport epiphytes (plants that grow on trees) and little floral and faunal communities all their own in the crooks of their branches. I love the trees that flower in stunning and unexpected ways, those that I can’t quite reach my arms around, and those that bend and wave in the wind. I love the trees of the Sierra Nevada, which, when down, were as “tall” as I am in their diameter alone, and the trees of Costa Rica, with the crazy latticework of the ficus, which is called matapalo (which means to kill wood) or “strangler fig” for the way it capitalizes on other trees’ growth to get up into the canopy. I love the dark spruce of Alaska’s boreal forest for the way they hide and shelter the life there, and I love the little shrubby, long-thorned bushes of southeastern South Africa, called “spekbom” by the locals, out of which any moment an entire herd of elephants might emerge, without notice. I love both plants and trees.

I have had a favorite tree in every place I’ve lived, in every house and every place of employment or study, for as long as I can remember. At Yale it is a huge, colossal pine, proud and tall and beautiful, which sneaks in along the perimeter of one of the science buildings, whose own scale masks the pine’s height and distracts the eye from its stature, right adjacent to where those familiar with Yale’s campus will be accustomed to finding the cupcake truck. It is also the large deciduous tree that flanks the Marsh Hall parking lot, predating the parking lot’s construction by far, and which you can see straight down into from the aerial perch that is that building’s cupola. I love in particular that the building and tree compliment one another so well – Marsh on its many floors gives you visual access to every element of that which the tree holds in its boughs.

In DC it was the towering old elm that was next to the back porch, whose leaves would be lit up as a greenish yellow by the outdated streetlights that ran along the alley behind 14th Street, and whose pollen doused my back porch and rendered my housemates squeaky voiced and sulky with allergies. Spunky squirrels inhabited that tree’s ancient branches, occasionally making a sudden, spontaneous appearance on part of our porch, scaring themselves as much as they startled us. In my hometown in New Jersey it was the Japanese Cherry Blossom tree on my front lawn, and the two big Red Oaks which towered over our house out back, protecting it; in the Catskills region of New York, where my grandmother’s cottage was, it was the towering, wisened old pines, obscuring all light from the front of the house, rendering the front lawn dead to all but its own shed needles, with nary a shoot of green in sight. In between there were the trees of my college campus, so many of them towering and gorgeous that it is hard to pick just one as a favorite. But if I had to choose I’d pick one of the amazing, beautiful trees out and along the road to Houghton House, our art building, many of which were of a scale not to be witnessed anywhere else on campus, or in the region.

My love for trees makes me a crappy backpacker. I am just as happy walking into the forest, sitting down, and making myself comfortable, as I am with trekking through it all day. I found that I was tremendously gratified recently when, on our last group outing, Gil and Katrina and I all admitted to one another somewhat embarrassingly that, for us, it’s becoming less and less about racking up the miles and checking off the trails, and more and more about just being in the woods. After we spied a couple with a well-established campsite in the backcountry in New York, with tarp firmly attached to the tree and freshwater fetched from a nearby bubbling stream, I decided in the future my backpacking trips should consist of a one day on, one day off schedule – one day to hike the usual 10-12 miles, one day to explore every bit of the forest around me. One day to hike 10-12 miles, one day to play in the woods…

When as a young adult I first became conscious of the fact that I was almost de facto entering into a professional field that focused on something so plain sounding as vegetation, I felt as if I was in a way settling for second place, passing up all the world’s fantastic fauna: lions and tigers and bears, baboons and whales and frogs, manatees and bats and pandas and voles, to spend entire summers of research focusing on grasses, legumes, and forbs, as I did in Minnesota, the effects of burning and cutting National Forest trees, as I did in California, or on a whole hell of a lot of different types of vegetation on the tundra of Alaska, where there are no trees. “Who gets excited about vegetation?” I wondered after someone asked me what I’d actually been doing for work in Alaska at a party one night, and I lost them after the first five words. Right around “vegetation.”

But here I am studying vegetation, excited about plants, and forests, and trees, and look where it has taken me. To Minnesota, to California, to Alaska, and to Costa Rica, Nepal, and indirectly, to South Africa. Most of my international travel has been fully paid for through work or research, and I am so privileged, at the moment, to be living in Nepal to study trees, and they way they grow as a result of the decisions we make to manage them. What great luck, I think now, to have fallen for vegetation.

And so I stood there in the face of the forest, admiring how it crawled up the huge slope and curved down and around its spine, to cover the backside of the hill in thick sweeps of green, like a royal mantle, a cloak. I tilted my head back slightly as the wind once again blew in the promise of a storm, and looked into the canopy as bits of vegetation and birds were blown from tenuous perches and out to meet the rest of the world. I stretched my arms out from my sides just a little, enough for them to be caught by the wind and pressed back and away from my sides, and I grinned.

And as I stood there, hanging in the wind and drinking in the scent of the forest, like a line out of a fairy-tale up walked a toothy little girl of about ten, hair in two black pigtails up and above her head, red ribbon bows neatly tied around each bundle of hair. In my memory she is wearing a blue dress tied at the waist, as Dorothy or Alice or Goldilocks or any number of other inquisitive little girls have worn, but in reality I believe it was a school uniform in the form of a dark blue jumper and light blue shirt.

She smiled dreamily up at me without hesitation, unconcerned by this peculiar bideshi leaning into the wind, and asked in good English, “what’s your name?” And I looked away from the forest long enough to smile back at her and say in Nepali, “Mero naam Meri ho.” My name is Meri. She looked into the forest in the direction I’d been staring, nodded in assent, and continued on her way down the little path. When I looked her way again she was walking slowly forwards, looking backwards over her shoulder now and then to see if I was still there, and grinning. And I for my part stood there and hoped for her that she might be one to find out for herself what there is to love in the forest around her home, and find it within herself to study and protect it. Maybe even just for the plain old, everyday love of trees.

-M-